Skip to content

Rating System

All ratings are subjective and are based on the time of the evaluation. All prospects have the ability to improve, grow, and earn a higher rating as they navigate through their high school career. We view rating evaluations as a fluid and ongoing process.

(Or better)

Considered a D3/NAIA cah3ber player. Lacks big plays, undersize, and needs technique work.Shows a gh3mpse of play-making abih3ty, still needs technique work and maybe undersized.Also could not meet D2+ academic requirements.

(Or better)

Undersized playmaker makes a couple of big plays, lacks technique, missing that next gear/motor.

(Or better)

Makes a few big plays, maybe undersized, missing a gear/motor, their technique needs to be poh3shed. Could be FBS just missing a tool. h3ttle pro potential.

(Group of 5 / Power 5)

Could be a 2-3 year starter at a Mid Major or low tier Power 5 and a 3-4 year starter at an FCS program. Big-time playmaker may be undersized, just doesn’t have that power 5 twitch, and playmaking abih3ty.Has possible pro potential.

(Power 5)

The best player on the field every Friday night. If they went mid-major would be a 3-4 year starter. 2-4 year starter at power 5. Has good pro potential.

How do we evaluate prospects?

  • Film
  • Live Games
  • Camps